https://www.tagesschau.de/ausland/europa/rumaenien-mini-akw-100.html

Die Baustelle, auf der Mini-Atomkraftwerke entstehen sollen, liegt am Rande des 4000 Einwohner Dorfs Doicesti, 90 Kilometer nördlich von Bukarest. Früher stand hier mal ein Kohlekraftwerk, doch es wurde vor anderthalb Jahren abgerissen. Zu einem Pressetermin im März ist auch die US-amerikanische Botschafterin in Bukarest, Kathkeen Kavalec, gekommen.

Denn die  Technologie für die kleinen modularen Kernreaktoren liefert die amerikanische Firma NuScale.

A bulldozer operates by solar panels, near a part of the construction site of the future SMR (small modular reactors) plant in Doicesti, Romania, March 18, 2024. REUTERS/Andreea Campeanukanische Firma NuScale.

Der rumänische Energieminister Sebastian Burduja zeigte sich vor der Presse mächtig stolz, er spricht von einem „historischen“ Tag. „Rumänien

hat sich viele Jahre lang daran gewöhnt, den Entwicklungen der anderen Länder keuchend hinterherzurennen.

Jetzt ist es an der Zeit, dass wir die Zukunft der Welt gestalten. Und die Zukunft der Energie ist diese.“

https://images.tagesschau.de/image/055b3260-847d-4166-8ad1-17a352b97974/AAABjmDUB68/AAABkZLrr6A/original/rumaenien-mini-akw-baustelle-102.jpgen.

Open letter to the Prime Minister of the Republic of Bulgaria     

 in bulgarischer Sprache   ->  

The government must quickly and permanently end the compromised Belene NPP project.

Mr. Borissov, we insist on your quick and decisive intervention to stop the lies and misconceptions spread by representatives of the government and the NRA through the media in the public regarding the prospects for the Belene NPP project, as well as to stop draining the state budget.

Belene NPP and the lying politicians

The world’s first illegal nuclear power plant?

The vigorous reporting of lies is a practice of the Minister of Energy, whether it concerns meetings with trade unions, the coal industry or nuclear energy. Regarding to Belene NPP, the government seems to be living in a parallel reality. One week ago, Minister Petkova announced in Parliament the union of the „three world leaders in nuclear energy“ to participate in the project (Russia’s Rosatom, France’s Framatome and America’s General Electric).

She called the merger a legally non-binding memorandum between these companies, with no commitment to a strategic investor, as it is actually sought under the procedure announced by the government.

The European Commission (EC) has sent a response letter to lawyer Albena Belyanova on behalf of Executive Vice President Westeger, as well as to Commissioners Simson, Breton and Sinkevicius on the Belene NPP status case. The letter very clearly states the facts and the current state of this project according to EU laws and requirements.

As usual, representatives of the Ministry of Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Agency (NRA) hastened to reverse and downplay the facts, stating that it is not necessary to issue a new license to the plant in order to mislead the public, apparently not having read the letter.

Maybe the energy ministry hopes to build the EU’s first illegal nuclear power plant?

In fact, the EC provides very important information in its response and due to the great importance of the facts for the future of the project, we need to clarify the main points in the letter, quoting them correctly to acquaint society, government and NRA with the real situation. The opinion of the EC presupposes concrete actions by the Bulgarian government.

The position of the EC briefly as follows:

1. Despite the renewal of the project in June 2018, according to the EC, no new actions have been taken so far in connection with the regulatory process, i.e. the project is at the stage of issuing an order for approval of the technical project by the NRA Chairman;

2. In 2019, the Commission reasonably responded to Minister Petkova, expressing the opinion that the planned new investment project should be the subject of an entirely new communication under Article 41 of the Euratom Treaty, and not a supplement to the 2007 Communication, i.e. the statements of the Minister of Energy that a new notification of the EC is not necessary but a sufficient addition to the notification do not correspond to the opinion expressed by the EC;

Minister Petkova ignored this response of the EC instead of triggering the necessary procedures. It is strange that she is still in office.

3. The Commission services are currently in the process of assessing the conformity of the independence of the competent regulatory body, the Nuclear Regulatory Agency, and in the event of a breach of the Nuclear Safety Directive (Article 5 (2) and (3)), the EC has the right to initiate proceedings to establish a violation against Bulgaria;

4. The Belene NPP project has not been subject to peer review by the EU based on the specifications of the stress tests performed to assess safety since 2011 following the Fukushima accident. After the presentation of the new project communication, the Commission will consider the issue of seismicity based on the latest safety assessments. That is, after submitting the mandatory new notification to the EC, the project will be assessed according to the new safety assessment criteria.

5. The compliance of the Bulgarian legislation with the provisions of the Nuclear Safety Directive regarding the transparency of the decision-making process in the licensing of nuclear installations is currently being assessed by the EC. In 2013, a referendum was held and a decision of the National Assembly was adopted for the final termination of the project.

6. The publication of the call for expressions of interest for a strategic investor in the Official Journal of the EU cannot lead to the conclusion that the European Commission has approved the project, nor that it meets all legal requirements; a simple publication of a call for expressions of interest in the Official EU newspaper does not mean that the project falls within the scope of EU public procurement directives. The publication should be seen as a way to increase the publicity and transparency of the call throughout the Union. The publication of the invitation for the procedure for selection of a strategic investor, which has been repeatedly pointed out by the Minister of Energy, in no way means that the legal requirements have been met.

7. The possibility for diversification of nuclear fuel supplies will be considered in the evaluation of the new notification to the EC. In a letter from the Minister of Energy to the EC, it is stated that Bulgaria will cooperate with the Euratom Supply Agency. However, as can be seen from the invitation to participate in the procedure for selecting a strategic investor, the supplier of nuclear fuel is predetermined.

8. The draft contract / draft agreement with the Strategic Investor for the construction of Belene NPP should be communicated to the EC on the basis of Article 103 of the Euratom Treaty, i.e. it will be reviewed and evaluated by the EC.

9. If the Belene project is subject to change, a new EIA or screening will have to be carried out in accordance with Directive 2011/92 / EU on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, as amended by Directive 2014/52 / EU. The EIA is from 2004. According to the announced plans of the government for the use of control systems of Framatom and a turbogenerator of General Electric, these are considered serious changes and therefore require a new EIA procedure.

10. According to the information available to the EC, the subject of the invitation is the acquisition of shares in a future company, which does not represent a construction, product, or service within the meaning of the EU directives in the field of public procurement. However, the call for expressions of interest cannot be understood as a means of selecting an economic operator who would carry out the construction works himself or provide the services or supplies related to the construction of the Belene NPP, as this could circumvent the EU directives on public procurement, i.e. the provision of supplies and services within the procedure for selection of a strategic investor may lead to the initiation of infringement proceedings against Bulgaria.

In our opinion, owing to the specific questions of lawyer Albena Belyanova, this response letter of the EC gives a great opportunity to understand the absurdity of the statements that Belene NPP is a possible and profitable project for the country, and that we have a license and permits to facilitate the investor.

The position of the European Commission clearly shows that a long process of legalization is forthcoming, meaning another postponement of the construction, which will prove once again the project’s economic insolvency. The rapid development of renewable energy technologies, energy efficiency worldwide and the EC’s special support for the energy transition make this project completely obsolete.

We offer the government:

-To announce the final end of the Belene NPP zombie by terminating the procedure for selecting a strategic investor and announcing an international competition for the creation of an industrial, nuclear-free zone on the plant site, using the built infrastructure. This will stop the waste of taxpayers‘ money. The provision of the site for an industrial zone will be an opportunity to return some of the investments made thus far. Za Zemiata has been insisting on this approach for over 20 years.

-To have a longer-term vision for the development of the energy sector than next year’s elections

-To focus on the development of energy efficiency, decentralization of energy production and access of individual households to renewable energy

– Refusal of energy mega projects that hinder the market principle of development of the sector and the development of competition

– The Ministry of Energy and the entire government must make great effort, bring together all stakeholders and make the best use of the opportunities for increased funding with European sources for the fair energy transition in Bulgaria. They need to prepare in the best way possible the national and regional plans for economic transformation of coal regions.

-The financing opportunities through the Green Deal, the Fair Transition Fund, the EU Economic Recovery Fund after the Covid crisis, React EU, Invest EU will be provided mainly on a competitive basis within the EU. The quality of the plans and projects will be assessed, more funds will be given to candidates from the countries, regions and businesses who have demonstrated greater capacity and vision for low-carbon economic development.

– Cessation of corrupt practices in the energy sector and state service of the interests of oligarchs

FROM:

Bulgarian and Romanian citizens and NGOs (full list below)

TO:

The Prime Ministers,

Ministers of Foreign Affairs,

Ministers of Finance,

Ministers of Ecology,

of the donor countries involved in the Programme, with European

taxpayers‘ money:

Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Greece, Ireland, the Netherlands,

Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the main contributor the

European Commission

TO: The President of the European Parliament

TO: The President of the European Commission

TO: Commission des pétitions European Parliament

TO: OLAF European Commisssion

TO: Mrs. Laura Kovesi

Serious Radiological Safety Problems of the Project for National Repository Low and Intermedium Level Radioactive Waste at Kozloduy NPP site

Letter of complaint to all donor countries of the Kozloduy NPP Units 1-4 Decommissioning

Programme and the National Disposal Facility under the supervision

of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development

Dear Prime ministers, Ministers of Foreign Affairs, Finance and Ecology

Dear President of the European Parliament, President of the European Commission

Dear Mrs. Laura Kovesi

Last week in Craiova Bulgarian and Romanian citizens, experts and NGO representatives

met and discussed serious radiological safety problems concerning the National RAW

Repository at Kozloduy NPP site, currently under construction. 70% of the project for the

National Repository for low and intermediate level short and long-lived RAW is funded by

donor countries and administered by the European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development. Donor countries are Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Greece, Ireland, the

Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the main contributor the European

Commission.

We discussed unresolved old and new issues related to the site selection, construction and

radiological safety and examined documents and facts of the appeal of the first and the

second EIA report before the Supreme Administrative Court in Bulgaria. When the first EIA

report was completely rejected by the court, the appeal case for the second EIA report of

the repository still continues before a five-member panel of the Supreme Administrative

Court.

Radiana site is next to the Bulgarian Kozloduy NPP, four kilometers away from the River

Danube, the state border with Romania. Work on the repository construction began in

Bulgaria with a court ruling for pre-implementation, despite violations of Romanian public

consultation procedures according the Espoo Convention, despite the repeatedly negative

Bulgarian (95% Against in a local referendum in Kozloduy) and Romanian (15,300 protest

signatures collected in Craiova) local public opinion against the project.

The highly worrying issues start with the very location of the site next to the Danube River,

on nearby groundwaters and on sand soils, they go through the design of the repository, and

reach to the types of radioactive waste that will be buried there. Ten are the long-lived

radionuclides some of which have a half-life of several hundred thousand and even several

tens of millions of years. One of the most recent problems with recurrent evidence is

related to the location of groundwater very close to the site, which is absolutely

unacceptable for any repository for burying radioactive waste for eternity.

With the money of the European taxpayers, you predestinate in this place – to the state

border and the bank of the Danube at only 5 meters above the current underground

waters, and in the tendency to shift the bed of the Danube to the south, ie. to the Radiana

site, when it is known that the presence of water in the Repository causes death in the

contaminated groundwater.

We also want to draw your attention to the fact that it is impossible to bury deep

underground on Radiana site, because of the hydrogeological conditions there but only to

the surface, which is contrary to the recommendations of the IAEA-Vienna – because of the

preservation of radioactivity for thousands of millions of years of more than a third

long-lived radionuclides from disposal inventory.

We also inform you that your funding is not intended for RAW only from the closed 1-4

units of the Kozloduy NPP, as experts mislead you, but at this site predetermined by your

current financing, in an inappropriate place at a harmful surface for human generations RAW

deployment, your funding will go to pay for the construction of the entire infrastructure for

the entire Repository, adding huge new quantities of RAW from units 5 and 6 of Kozloduy

NPP as well as from the planned new two nuclear units in Belene NPP and new Unit 7 in

Kozloduy NPP. All these units’ RAW are included in the estimates for this repository in the

current EIA report.

As legitimate representatives of the affected public, in accordance with the UN Conventions

of Aarhus and Espoo,

 WE WANT you to worry about the conclusion made by the independent authors of the

Second EIA Report on the Radiana site: „Long-lived radionuclides will emerge with radiation

in the biosphere after several hundred years”,

which is an absolute prerequisite for you to stop the funding by European taxpayers‘ money

on the completely inappropriate Radiana site and to continue funding after choosing

another site that is far from the Danube River and is with a suitable geological structure for

deep burial as recommended by the IAEA Vienna for long-lived radioactive waste. That site

could be selected among the dozens recommended by the Geological Institute of the

Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and by the UK and French authorities which took part in the

PHARE report.

We urge you to take action to suspend funding.

Please reply as soon as possible!

List of Bulgarian and Romanian citizens and NGOs:

Romanian:

Asociația Civică pentru Viata, ACpV, Craiova

President professor Adi-Maria Simoiu

(ACpV was involved in civic actions in Craiova, Romania to raise 15 300 signatures of people

asking for referendum to be consulted about the radioactiv repository Radiana, the 7th Unit

at NPP Kozloduy and extension of operation time of Redactor 5 and 6 illegally, ESPOO

convention was not respected.)

Pro Democratia Club Craiova

President Carla Stoica, Marcel Răduţ Selişte – communication expert

C.R.O.N.O

President Lucian Zuleanu

Sindicatul „Solidaritatea Universitara“, Universitatea din Craiova

President Mugurel Popescu

Anda Simion

Specialist in Comunicare

Bulgarian:

National Movement “Ecoglasnost”

Deputy Chairman engineer-mathematician Peter Penchev

Association of the Free Speech “Anna Politkovskaya”

Member of the Public Board engineer-mathematician Peter Penchev

Foundation for Agriculture and Development

President Albena Simeonova, member of the Executive board at Nuclear Transparancy

Watch

Political Party “Green Movement” (Bulgarian Greens)

Co-chair Borislav Sandov, a qualified expert at Nuclear Transparency Watch

D-r Petar Kardjilov, PhD, risks and crises communication expert, member of the Union of

Scientist in Bulgaria, a qualified expert at Nuclear Transparency Watch

***************

Contacts:

D-r Petar Kardjilov, PhD – GSM +359886473288, e-mail: p.kardzhilov@gmail.com

Peter Penchev , engineer-mathematician – GSM +359887525032, e-mail:

p_p_trojanski@yahoo.com

Gesendet: Mittwoch, 05. Februar 2020 19:18

Letter to “Danube region nuclear free” organization

Ref Low and medium radiaoctivity waste repository at Radiana, Kozloduy

Dear colleagues,

Before kindly asking for your support in an activity related to the mandate of the organization, firstly, we want to present a few facts about the nuclear danger from Kozloduy, due the new developments in the region.

1. Unfortunately after the operating licenses expired in 2017, respectively in 2019 for reactors 5 and 6, Bulgaria approved the lifetime extensions for the two reactors for another 30 years without consulting Romania as a possible affected state, at cross-border level, therefore breaking the ESPOO Convention. The waste form theses reactors, will be brought, also, at Radiana repository.

It is highly alarming the fact that in July, August, November and December 2019 reactors 5 and 6 had multiple malfunctions including the safety systems and cooling pumps.

The result of these serious nuclear incidents, in case of a calamity at Kosloduy, the population of Craiova situated in the major risk zone (under 100km) cannot be evacuated. In the same situation are the inhabitants of the much closer villages on Romanian and Bulgarian side of the Danube river.

2. In December 2016, the president of the ACpV, represented Romania at the Luxembourg European Committee (Aarhus conference) where, based on info from institutions with obligations in the emergency and response in such situations, it was presented extensively, not only how unprepared is Romania in case of a nuclear accident, but also lack of transparency of the responsible authorities.

3. The building of the national Bulgarian nuclear repository, at Radiana (in the perimeter of Kosloduy), only 4km from the Danube poses a major radioactive contamination risk. The repository, made from concrete, at the surface, is going to have an unjustified capacity of 350.000 tons and a lifespan of approx. 350 years. The decisive public debate set in a cross-border context as per ESPOO convention, at the Philharmonic of Craiova on the 9^th of June 2016, also broke the international conventions: the organization of the debate was not mediatized, resulting in an insignificant number of participants (about 15-20 majority of them unware with the topic). Bulgarian and Romanian authorities had an intimidating and discouraging attitude for the participation of the public in the debate; the translation of the intervention of Bulgarian specialists opposing to the project was also refused.

Later, after the official debate, we found out that the repository is partially funded by EBRD and partially by the governments of other states among which Belgium, Netherlands, Spain, Austria, Luxembourg, Greece, France.

4. During the 5 years ( since 2015) of involvement in these civic activities we gave detailed information to all authorities of the Romania, ref technical data, mostly obtained from opposing Bulgarian experts, including the former head of Bulgarian Nuclear Agency, professor Georgi Kaschiev.

Former Romanian PM, Dacian Ciolos, former Ministers of Environment, Cristina Pasca Palmer and Gratiela Gavrilescu, former Minister of Foreign Affairs were also informed. The returned answers explained that the Minister of Environment has made all the necessary steps, and The Minister of Foreign Affairs stated that it will inform the corresponding Bulgarian Minister.

As a result of the passive attitude of the Romanian authorities on this topic, A.C.p.V decided to specifically address to the funder of the radioactive waste repository, EBRD, requesting the cessation of financial support to this project, considering that it manages public funds and in conformity with the EBRD mandate and EU directives, the usage of public founds for encouraging development of nuclear industry and non-transparent projects is not allowed. According to the Bulgarian civil society representatives information, the repository at Radiana, besides the low to medium radioactivity waste resulted from the decommissioning of reactors 1-4, will include, also radioactive waste from the illegal ( Romania was not consulted despite official request of A. Korody, former Minister of environment) functioning of reactors 5 and 6 for additional 30 years, as well as radioactive waste from Belene (The Bulgarian Government recently approved starting the nuclear unit form Belene situated in the proximity of a major seismic risk zone).

After the Cernobil accident, the concrete sarcophagus which covered the remains after the explosion, has deteriorated after approximately 30 years. The rhetorical question is: how a concrete waste reppsitory is going to last for 350 years, located on alluvial terrain, in the immediate vicinity of the Danube river?! A Romanian expert in materials resistance, professor Dan Ilincioiu form the University of Craiova ( unfortunately is no longer among us), stated in the official debate in June 2016 that project Radiana is “an engineering embarrassment!”

6. EBRD admitted our complaint in June 2018, and under the solving mechanism of the complaint, Project Complaint Mechanism, assigned a mediator between the EBRD representative, the Bulgarian construction company, SERAW and the civic Bulgarian & Romanian society (President of Asociatia Civica pentru Viata is designated as leader of the Romanian Group and Albena Simionova is the leader of the Bulgarian group).

In the mediation process, official preliminary meetings were held in Craiova and Kosloduy, in 2018 and 2019.

As a result of the recent videoconference, on 10th January, with the Project Manager from EBRD, Valentin Seider, the mediator and the EBRD representative, we established that the next official meeting, with the involved parties, should take place in Craiova again.

Recently the date of the meeting was agreed with all parties to be on the 18^th of February 2020. For this meeting, EBRD accepted to send official invitation to experts proposed by the Romanian and Bulgarian representatives of the civil society.

In this regard, we would appreciate if the “Danube region nucler free organization” could designate a representative to participate at the official meeting in Craiova on 18 February 2020 to support with appropriate expertize our activities trying so hard to protect the Danube river from future possible radioactive contamination.

We thank you in advance for your support !

Luminita Simoiu

President of the ACpV, Romania

Report by Luminita Simoiu Feb. 2019 

TRILATERAL MEETING ON NATIONAL DISPOSAL FACILITY PROJECT TOOK PLACE IN KOZLODUY

On the 7^th of December 2018 in the town of Kozloduy (Bulgaria) representatives of civil society organizations from Romania and Bulgaria and representatives of the Bulgarian State Enterprise for Radioactive Waste (SERAW) participated in a joint meeting to discuss issues related to the construction of a repository for low and medium radioactive waste located on Bulgarian territory near the town of Kozloduy. The Problem-solving Initiative is led by the Project Complaint Mechanism (PCM) of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD).

The Project Complaint Mechanism is the EBRD’s accountability mechanism which provides an opportunity for independent review of complaints from one or more individual(s) or organisation(s) concerning an EBRD Project, which are of high importance to Romanian public.

In March 2018 civil society representatives from Romania and Bulgaria raised concerns with the PCM in relation with the construction of the Radiana repository. These concerns were related with the project’s impact on the population and the environment, highlighting a necessity for transparency and public consultations. EBRD is administering the Kozloduy International Decommissioning Support Fund, which co-finances the first stage of the disposal facility construction to accommodate low and intermediate level radioactive waste steaming from decommissioning of Units 1-4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria.

In line with the PCM Rules of Procedure, Leonardo D’Urso was appointed to serve as independent Mediator for the Problem-solving Initiative to facilitate the dialogue between civil society representatives and the SERAW Company to resolve the issues addressed to the PCM without attributing blame or fault.

During this first joint meeting, which was hosted by SERAW at their offices in Kozloduy, parties had a chance meet each other, again, and to initiate the dialogue process under the PCM procedure. A joint visit to the repository construction site was organized by SERAW for civil society representatives. The meeting started with the signing of a Framework Agreement for the Dialogue Process by Mr. Dilyan Petrov, the Executive Director of SERAW, and Ms. Luminita Simoiu, the President of the Civil Association for Life from Craiova, Romania and lead civil society representative. The participants in the joint meeting, addressing questions and concerns were: a member of Romanian Parliament, a representative from the Craiova and Dabuleni local administrations, a doctor from the Pediatric Oncology Clinique of the Dolj County Hospital, in Craiova, representatives from different trade unions, academia and civil society from both Romania and Bulgaria.

Parties agreed that: „They will make decisions by consensus during the dialogue process in order to build trust, respect, cooperation and acceptable solutions for the benefit of all stakeholders.“

During the meeting, the Chief engineer of SERAW, Ms. Ira Stefanova, made a presentation about the purpose of the repository, technical details of the construction and the current status of the project. The presentation was followed by a visit to the construction site. The main topics presented were similar with those presented at the music hall in Craiova, Romania on 9.06.2016 during the official public debate. During the subsequent discussions, civil society representatives had the opportunity to express various concerns and to raise various questions  about  the repository construction, such as the repository design and storage capacity, the site selection for the repository construction, the project financing and the type of waste stored, the environmental impact on communities, the mechanisms for prevention and intervention in the case of accident, the guarantees provided by SERAW on environmental protection and compliance with European standards on radioactive waste etc. SERAW representatives committed to continuously provide, in the months to come, relevant and up-to-date information referring to the various issued raised during the meeting.

At the end of the meeting, parties expressed the willingness to continue the dialogue process in an open and transparent manner and agreed that a second joint meeting under the PCM’s Problem-solving will take place in a 2 to 3 months’ time in Craiova, Romania.

17.10.2016: Brief an den rumänischen Außenminister betr. AKW Kozloduy (engl.)

15.9.2016: Bericht über Aktionen der Civic Association for Life und der Civic Action Group, Craiova (englisch)

Über die sogenannte öffentliche „Debatte“ in Craiova am 9.Juni 2016 anlässlich des geplanten Atommüllendlagers in Radiana, Bulgarien (ca. 4 km von der Donau entfernt) (englisch)

Civic Association for Life (A.C.p.V) PRESS RELEASE, 28.03.2016

afis miting MARTIE

Fotos vom Protestmarsch am 22.11.2015 in Craiova

24.11.2015: Luminita Simoiu schreibt per Email:

Diashow Craiova

ÜBERBLICK zu E-Mails von Georgeta Ionescu und Luminita Simoiu aus CRAIOVA:

(1) 14.9.2015: Rumänische Bürgerinitiative gegen grenznahes bulgarisches AKW Kosloduj erfüllt die Bedingungen für ein Referendum

(2) 25.9.2015: Verletzung der demokratischen Rechte – Rumänische Bürgerinitiative ist gescheitert

(3) 27.10.2014: Vielleicht sollten wir eine Konferenz organisieren

(4) 31.10.2015. Über das Sicherheitsrisiko des AKW Kosloduj

August 2015, Lucian ȘTIRB (TERRA Mileniul III)

Neues aus Bukarest, August 2015

Derzeit sind im AKW Cernavoda 2 Reaktoren in Betrieb. Ursprünglich waren in den 1970-er Jahren 5 Reaktoren geplant.